Wednesday, 10 September 2025

Upgrading our laptop - what does an astrophotographer need?

 My old laptop is a dell XPS 13. Portable, lightweight, compact. It has done sterling service for the last eight years. It has travelled with us extensively; been dropped and generally thrown around in a rucksack and a motorhome. Its lid is covered with stickers collected over our travels. I am very, very sentimentally attached to it. 

I love my old laptop. I was heartbroken when I discovered that windows 10 updates will stop in October. I immediately sought to upgrade my old XPS but, alas, on reading up on the dell website, I discovered that my processor was one generation too old. An interent search on various forums confirmed my worst fears; those who had tried to migrate across to Windows 11 on this laptop had had nothing but problems subsequently. 

So, the boss and I decided now was the time to upgrade - but to what? 

Well, we travel a lot so a desk top is out. As is a large heavy laptop. Maggie decided that our new one should have specs that would allow me to continue my astrophotography journey for the next few years. I am slowly progressing towards PixInSight, Star exterminator etc - so it will need some grunt! We want something which will last us another eight years, so good reliable build quality.  I was dispatched to do some research.

My old laptop had an inbuilt graphics Intel card, 256 Gb storage drive and 8Gb of RAM. It has done amazingly well, hasn't it. 

After some thinking, here is my list of 'requirements' for my new laptop

  • bigger screen - 14"
  • still lightweight and portable; slim build
  • non touch screen but with good high resolution and colour reproduction/contrast for photo editing (1920 x 1080 minimum) 
  • haptic keyboard
  • 32 or 64Gb RAM so I can work more quickly with Fits files and stacking
  • a good CPU quad core (minimum) processor intel i7 or i9 is my preference, for speedy stacking, rendering, etc 
  • fast NVMe SSD 1 TB drive 
  • a Nividia RTX 3060 GPU graphics card 6 GB minimum
  • at least four USB ports - thunderbolt 4 would be preferable; built in SD cartd reader as well 
  • efficient thermal cooling technology; multiple fans which are QUIET!
  • long lasting battery - at least 18 hours if possible 
  • good after sales back up and service
Why all the high end specs stuff? Well, I use a DSLR and shoot in RAW. RAW images can be data intensive and stacking a hundred or so and all the calibration frames as well can be really draining on computer resources. My old laptop has struggled at times, especially when using SIRIL.  The CPU does all the grunt work and so I need something more powerful. Fast storage is a must when processing and editing all these files. And of course, the more programs I download in the future, the more memory space I will need so 1 TB seems to be the thing and within my budget - just! As well as editing thye photos, I also make YouTube videos and this is where the old laptop struggled - writing voideos to storage; video editing software etc. Laggy!  This should be so much more quicker with a faster SSD drive. 


What have I ended up with?

Another Dell XPS. No seriously, I looked at hundreds of diffrent laptops of various makes on-line and in store; but at the end, I kept coming back to two brands - Dell and Lenovo. I have used them both throughouit my teaching career and they have proven to be bomb proof as far as I am concerned.  
Dell were selling off the last of their XPS ranges and offering substantial discounts as they have introduced a new 'different' laptop range this year. Consequently, I paid precisely what I paid for the old one eight years ago but this time with a £500 discount on top and the extra warranties thrown in. 

My new configuration specs are: 

  • CPU - Intel Core Ultra 7 155H  12 core 3,85 Ghz processor 
  • 32 Gb RAM
  • fast NVMe SSD 1 TB drive 
  • a dedicated Nividia RTX 3060 GPU graphics card 6 GB minimum
  • 14" screen, slim, lightweight
  • haptic keyboard
  • non touch screen with high resolution
  • battery that lasts 18 hrs
  • ultra quiet two fans and four cooling vents 
  • 2 year warranty extension
  • 2 year battery warranty extension
  • superior after sales technical support package
Basically, I got everything I wanted at a budget I could afford.  Having used the laptop for the last month, I have to say I am really impressed. It is blisteringly fast, lovely to use and rather stylish in design. The haptic keyboard is a revelation. 

Sadly the weather hasnt yet played ball and so I have yet to use SIRIL on it but I suspect it will be far faster than what I have been normally used to.  I'll let you know! 



Friday, 8 August 2025

A beginner's guide to post editing your first milky way photograph

 If you are interested in learning how to take a milky way photograph then just use the search box on this blog - type in 'milky way' and all the posts should materialise. 

In this blog post I am going to share how I post edit my milky way photographs after stacking them. I tend to take multiple shots and then stack them. I do foreground shots separately, process them and then blend the two together. It is a dark art and I rarely get it right but slowly I am making progress. Some days! 

This is a tracked, stacked composite photo
a separate sky blended with a separate foreground shot, both from the same location
sky details: 60" x 15 tracked at ISO 3200 F/2.8
foreground: blue hour ISO 800 15"
Sky stacked in Sequator and processed in SIRIL, GraXpert and Affinity Photo 


So, after stacking my milky way lights in either SIRIL, Affinity Photo or Sequator, what do I then do to them?  Well, this post is all about the sky/milky way bit only. I am aiming to get detail in the stars; detail in the milky way; a natural look to the sky with minimal noise and artifacting. 


Here are my steps to post editing the sky/milky way element: 

  1. a 'global' edit in 'Develop' persona in Affinity photo - what other programs may call camera RAW
  • White balance - cool look between 3500K and 4500K
  • slight increase to exposure if the sky/milky way look underexposed - but I try to avoid blowing out the stars
  • adding some contrast to separate out the milky way (MW) from the background sky
  • raising the shadows slightly to reveal the MW details 
  • lower the highlights slider a little to recover bright stars
  • add a moderate amount of clarity and/or texture to enhance details and recover detail in the dust lanes
  • some initial noise reduction - some modest luminance early on. 
Exactly same data collected but processed slightly differently 


Having made these global edits - I now duplicate the layer in the layer stack and do subsequent work on this

2.  next some curves and levels adjustments
  •  firstly, pulling up the mid tones
  • adding a little more contrast by adjusting dark and light ends of the histogram curve - applying a series of very small shallow S curve adjustments 
  • some level adjustments to clip unwanted black levels and to brighten image overall
  • playing about with midtones and shadows to darken the background sky without affecting the MW - using selections and masks
3. Enhancing the milky way detail using selections and masks 
  • applying some local contrast adjustments on the duplicate layer - using high pass or unsharp filters
  • applying some dehazing and clarity to selected areas to enhance detail
  • some selective masking to enhance particular adjustments such as boosting contrast further
  • colour balance and hue work - to make the core pop
  • saturation masks to control colour boosting in selected areas of the MW
stacked in sequator - but even with ground 'frozen' mode - the foreground is still out of kilter


4. Noise reduction and star control work
  • I may save the image as a Tiff at this point an put it into GraXpert for background work and denoising before bringing it back into affinity photo for further work
  • I may well also put it into SIRIL and do starnet separation work to get a starless image and a starmask image. I will work on this latter image to reduce star size, intensity and frequency before doing a star recomposition. This then gives me an image where the milky way isn't overpowered by surrounding stars
5. some colour grading work
  • using gradient maps or selective colour to add subtle purple, blue and magenta hues to the milky way area (this is one area I just don't understand and haven't yet got right) 
6.  some final touches 
  • cropping
  • removing any distractions e.g. trails
  • sharpening the MW core a little more using masks

It all sounds so easy doesn't it. Well this is my workflow order. Of course where I fall down is understanding how to do masks and selections; how to use opacity and different blend modes. It's the practical tools manipulation bit in affinity photo which is proving my downfall! 

Very frustrating I must say. 

Saturday, 19 July 2025

Beginner's guide to using a DSLR camera and/or GoPro for taking star trail photographs

 The Weather has been pants hasn't it. Everytime there has been a clear night recently, it has always coincided with a full moon; or I have had other pressing family commitments and so haven't been able to get out at night. 

So I am severely curtailing my ambitions for my landscape astrophotography over the next few months. What I would like to walk away with at the end of October is the following:

  • a circular star trail landscape photograph of my local church
  • similar photo of Windy Cross (A Granite cross and little leat waterfall) on Dartmoor 
  • a star trail photo of Rame Head chapel
On the milky way landscape photo front, my ambitions are to obtain by end of October:

  • Dartmouth Day mark 
  • Start Point Lighthouse
  • Rame Head chapel
  • Wembury Church
  • The Great Mewstone at Wembury Point 
  • a better image of Bigbury Island under the milky way alongside one of the huge beach tractor as well
So, to the focus of this blog post. Star trails on a DSLR and/or GoPro. 

Funds are tight. I cannot afford another DSLR body at the moment. My two other cameras are a GoPro Hero 9 and a Sony HX-90 digital compact.  I think the trails will be easier to do on the GoPro, but I am open to that belief being challenged. 

Copyright: Wheal Owles by Simon Torr



So, here are my tips for using your DSLR to gain star trail images:

*source of some information: Peter Zelinka Star Trails tutorial
** I haven't yet shot any star trail images so these are my PLANNED INTENDED settings for future shoots 

Firstly equipment! You will need:
  • DSLR
  • dummy battery and power bank OR several spare batteries
  • Stable tripod with good ball head
  • Intervalometer
  • wide angle lens - in my case my samyang 14mm. If you want curves - try a 24mm lens, for lines, try 50mm
  • Fast SD card - you will need a class 10 UHS class 3 memory card, minimum 32gb - better 64gb

    Secondly, what settings do we use? 
    1. apply the 300 rule and go for 90% sky coverage in your landscape photo 
    2. do one foreground shot at the start or end of your session - so that you can merge it with your stacked star trails in post editing
    3. settings:  ISO 1600+ to get lots of stars and dense bright trails; ISO 100 - 800 to get fewer stars and bigger gaps between individual trails with better star colours. In an urban sky - try ISO 400 to 800 at F/4 to F/5.6
    4. If light conditions are too bright - reduce ISO and open up the aperture - try F/4
    5. shutter speeds - 20 to 30". However, if you use a very low ISO you can increase your shutter speed to 60", 120" or even 180", capturing more light, a cleaner image with less noise and grain. 
    6. White balance 3000 - 5200K. I will be probably starting at 3600K. Don't use 'auto'
    7. LNR off
    8. use an intervalometer. Here it gets tricky. You will either use a 1" delay between your shots or the length of your shutter speed + 1" more. And you need to experiment first before you go out for the night. Peter Zelinka's tutorial really explains it well and you can access it here https://www.peterzelinka.com/startrails
    9. I set my intervalometer to take around 3 hrs worth of shots minimum, but that's just me. 
    10. set your DSLR to evaluative metering
    11. Direction - face north = circles; S = downward arcs; E or W = upward arcs


    So what about settings for your GoPro? Mine is a Hero 9

    • Night Lapse mode
    • FOV - wide
    • shutter speed 30" - if in urban environments - then shorten it
    • Interval - auto
    • ISO 100 - 200 (or 100 min to 800 max)
    • If using Protunes - Flat colour and WB of 4000 - 5500K
    • shoot in RAW images
    • collect 3 - 5 hrs worth of images
    Equipment: 
    • stable tripod
    • spare batteries and/or powerbank and cable
    • GoPro camera


    Above is an outline of how I go about getting my star trail images. The next step is how to post edit them ad for that I use a program called Starstax.  Having not yet taken any star trails, I won't go into using StarStax until I have used it myself. 

    Tuesday, 15 July 2025

    Imaging IC1396 and the Elephant Trunk's nebula.

     This is my first attempt at IC 1396, a large emission nebula which is a region of ionized gas that glows due to the energy from nearby stars, particularly a very bright, massive star (HD 206267).

    It is two nights worth of data as outlined below taken over two nights when there was a full moon, so to be honest I am pleasantly surprised that anything showed up at all!


    IC 1396 has a magnitude of 3.5 and is in the constellation Cepheus, approximately 2,400 light-years away from Earth; a vast and complex area. Its most prominent feature is the Elephant's Trunk Nebula (IC1396A), a concentration of interstellar gas and dust forming a dark, finger-like structure. The entire IC1396 nebula spans over 3 degrees and has a near hollow and gas-poor interior and a complex of dark nebulae threaded throughout the perimeter. Many of the dust structures are aligned so they appear to radiate away from the stars in the nebula’s core.

    Look for the reddish star which is Mu Cephei, also known as Herschel’s Garnet Star. The tenth brightest star in the constellation Cepheus, with an average apparent brightness of 4.08, it has a radius 1,260–1,650 times that of the Sun and is one of the biggest stars ever discovered; situated at a distance of about 2,840 light-years from Earth.

    IC 1396A, better known as the Elephant Trunk Nebula, is a dark nebula formed by an irregular pillar of dust many light-years long. Pressure from bright stars in the core blows dust from that area leaving behind a darker region at the centre of the nebula while compressing dust around the edges, which drives new star formation. As a result, up to 250 young stars- all less than 100,000 years old, have been detected in infrared images taken of the Trunk region. The Trunk itself is about 20 light-years long. It is the first image in which I have ever captured a strong star formation area of the heavens above.

    Imaging equipment used:  Canon 800D DSLR, Zenithstar 61ii refractor scope, EQM-35-Pro mount and guiding with ASIair mini, RVO 32mm guide scope and ZWO 120mm mini guide cam.

    Data acquisition: two nights of same data collection – ISO1600, lights 25 x 300”, 10 darks, 10 biases and 15 flat frames. Full moon at 96%+ on each night. Location – two different sites in Cornwall.


    So, what do I think about the images?

    They were quite hard to process. I use SIRIL, GraXpert and Affinity Photo and somewhere along the way I tend to over saturate the colours and incorrectly process the background sky. I have overstretched the images resulting in star over-bloating as well. So, these are very much a first effort.

    Am I pleased with them? Yes. Sort of. I am pleased I captured the data on very bright moonlit nights from two separate locations. The post editing? Well, as always, it is a work in progress isn’t it. 

    Report card?  Considerable effort, showing some good acquisition skills but clearly more focus required in post editing! B+

    These are the minimally processed first effort images 



    First effort 'over-cooked' images
    So a third effort will be necessary over the next few days


    What do you think I could do to improve the processing further? Let me know in the comment box below. Thanks 

    My most recent re-edits.....progress is slow! 😅










    Tuesday, 8 July 2025

    IC 1318 The Sadr region

     The Sadr region, known as IC 1318 or the Gamma Cygni Nebula, is a diffuse emission nebula that surrounds the star Sadr.  Around 5000 light years away from Earth, the area also includes the Crescent Nebula (NGC 6888) and The Butterfly Nebula as well - which is really IC 1318. You can see a dark thin dust alley and then two glowing cosmic wings either side of it - hence 'The butterfly'. 

    The nebulas glow comes from nearby stars releasing streams of charged particles known as stellar winds; these ionise the gases causing them to emit light. 

    Sadr is a yellow-white supergiant with x12 the mass of our sun and x 150 its radius. It lies at the centre of this stunning Hydrogen II emission region. 

    So, acquisition details? 

    This is the result of two nights worth of data, processed in SIRIL and Affinity Photo. 

    Equipment used: 

    • Astro-modded Canon 800D
    • Samyang 135mm F/2.8 lens
    • EQM-35-Pro mount
    • ASIair mini with RVO 32mm guide scope and ZWO 120mm mini guide cam
    • Optolong L-enHance filter clip in eos
    Acquisition times:  on each night 

    • 35 x 240" subs
    • 10 darks
    • 10 biases
    • 20 flats 
    I find post editing difficult. There is so much to learn and I am never sure whether I am getting the final image right in terms of tone and look at the end of it all! 

    But, here are my three attempts thus far in the order I did them: 

    So, this one is fairly good. I like it but I felt I could have done a slightly more aggressive black point adjustment to get the background sky darker; taking care not to blow out the stars

    😧From one extreme to another. Second go and I overcooked it - too much saturation, vibrance and contrast. Back to the drawing board! 

    And my third effort - a halfway house. Better sky, better colours, not oversaturated but lost the stars! 
    Have I ever told you this post editing alarkey is hard work? 

    Monday, 30 June 2025

    Beginner's guide to taking calibration frames in Astrophotography

     When I first started out in astrophotography, there was a lot to get my head around – how to use my DSLR on manual; how to use my kit lenses, what additional gear to get; even how to focus in the dark!

    My first images were stacked in Deepskystacker and when the results emerged – dust spots, red pixels, and ‘darker’ patches were scattered across the image. Very disappointing. Hardly surprising really. I hadn’t come across the term ‘calibration frames’ then. Now I have and I fully realise their importance in obtaining great astrophotography images.

    So, what are these ‘calibration frames’ and what do they do that is so important? The frames are additional sets of images taken at the start, part way through or end of our astrophotography session. Simply put, they help clean up our final images by removing or correcting imperfections for known defects or inconsistencies on our camera sensor; they clean up our data before we start stretching and post editing it.

    I take three types of calibration frames. Each one has a specific role to play in improving the quality of my final stacked image. The types are:

    Dark Frames

    Biases Frames

    Flat frames

    But before getting into the specifics, lets remind ourselves of the other type of frames – lights!

    Light frames are the main images we take of our deep sky or milky way sky objects. Rich in signal from our intended target, they will often contain amounts of the dreaded ‘noise’. Then there may be aberrations, vignetting, hot pixels, plane and satellite trails; not forgetting sensor irregularities, read noise, uneven light gradients, dust motes and more. Basically then, all the stuff that needs to be removed or corrected within them.  Our light frames are straightforward enough to capture aren’t they. We select our deep space object, align our lens towards it, set our ISO or gain and correct our focus, before taking multiple images for stacking later.

    So, why is taking calibration frames as well such an important thing to do?

     

    Dark Frames work on sensor noise. Heat produced by our camera creates thermal noise and hot pixels. A dark frame photo is taken with the lens or telescope cap on so that no light can get into the imaging train. Same exposure time, ISO/gain and temperature as our light frames. All we capture is the noise! Having identified this noise, we can now use the frame to eliminate or ‘subtract’ this unwanted data from our stacked data. No more or severely reduced hot pixels, thermal noise patterns etc.

    A dark frame from my astro-modded Canon 800D

    We can build a library of darks frames – for different exposure times – and reuse them; if you are using a dedicated cooled astro cam. However, I mainly focus on use of DSLR on this blog and here it is trickier to build such a library. This is because dark frames also depend on the ambient temperature changes encountered from one imaging session to the next. Keep our DSLR either on or off our scope when taking dark frames. I just put my lens/telescope dust cap back on and continue shooting using the same exact settings as my light frames! It takes longer in the field but I don’t mind being out under the stars! One tip for taking darks with a DSLR is to ensure that no stray light can enter the sensor area, so I block off my eyepiece viewfinder with tape. A friend puts a small, lightweight, dark coloured fleece blanket over her rig when taking them. Now that’s dedication!

    So, how many dark frames should we take? How long is a piece of string? Reading around, between 10 – 20 seems the norm. I’ve seen some astronomy sites recommend between 20 – 30, arguing the more the better for obtaining a clean image. The key bit – DO NOT wait until the following night to take your darks. We take them on the night we are shooting. Remember same or as close as temperature to when we shoot our light frames.

     

    A Bias frame on my astro-modded Canon 800D

    Bias frames capture Read noise; the electronic ‘pattern’ and ‘read’ noise generated when the sensor reads the data and the camera downloads an image. We set our camera to the fastest shutter speed it can do – in my case 1/4000”, keep the cap on the lens/telescope and keep the ISO the same as our lights. So, we are shooting very short exposures. Take the stray light prevention measures outlined above when doing dark frames. Stacking these with our light images will help correct ‘fixed pattern’ noise and remove unwanted artifacts from dark and light frames.

    How many? 20 – 50 seem the consensus needed to ensure accurate calibration.

     

    Flat frames correct uneven illumination and vignetting and remove dust motes on our sensor thus ensuring a smooth background in our final images. There are a number of different methods for taking flat frames and you can go research these to find which is best for your set up, but here is what I do:

    I cut out part of a clean white T shirt and stretch it between a small embroidery hoop that is just a slightly larger diameter than my Samyang 135mm lens and Zenithstar 61 ii aperture. I then place it over the aperture of my lens/telescope and then place a small tablet over the top of this. It has an ‘evenly lit’ white screen. Keeping my camera and telescope/lens in the same set up as my light frames i.e. no changes to focus, ISO or imaging train etc, I change my DSLR to AV mode and then take short exposures, avoiding any clipping of the histogram. I am aiming to have the histogram about a third or half way across from the left-hand side. I cannot emphasis this point enough – we must NOT change our imaging train or shooting circumstances. So, no changes to camera rotation, focus, ISO etc.

    Adding flat frames into the stacking of our images helps correct vignetting, dust shadows etc and they are one of the easiest ways of boosting our final image quality and should therefore not be missed out.

    A flat frame taken on my astro-modded Canon 800D. The file has been reduced in size slightly for upload to the blog. 

    How many do I take? Normally around 10 – 20 flat frames. I take mine at the end of my imaging session after my darks and bias frames.

    Some quick clarification by the way  – vignetting is the light fall off towards the outside of your light frame. It might resemble a dark circle.

     

    I tend to use SIRIL, Affinity Photo, Deepskystacker and Sequator for post editing my astro images and each has a calibration phase when you add your calibration frames into the stack with your lights. The software then applies the various corrections before any alignment and integration. Clever software!

    Essentially what seems to happen is that bias frames are combined to create a master average bias frame. This is then subtracted from the dark frames to remove bias noise. Flat frames are calibrated and then either the master bias or the master dark frame is subtracted from flat frames. Calibrated flats form a master flat frame. The master dark is subtracted from our lights.  Everything is then aligned and stacked. Probably an oversimplification of the process.

    So,  should we skip doing any of them? You will hear, see, read that people do!  All I can say is I don’t. For me they are the difference between a clean astro image and one with those distracting artefacts in them.  Do I keep a library of them as a DSLR user? No! Why? I’m constantly switching lenses and telescopes. There are temperature and humidity variations from night to night. I suspect there is dust on some of my optics. Adjustments to ISO, exposure time, focus. Camera rotation to get best framing of my DSO target. The list is endless isn’t it. 

    In conclusion – I hope this simple overview helps you understand calibration frames better. They are foundational to our astro imaging post processing work. Used correctly we can remove/reduce noise, aberrations, vignetting and produce higher quality finished images. Most free programs I use do it all for me, so I just need to ensure that I have taken my time and care over capturing my calibration frames correctly.

    Good luck in capturing yours.

    The final image after stacking the lights and the calibration frames 


    Noctilucent clouds

     Finally, I have seen my first ever noctilucent clouds, and all from the comfort of my own front step.  11.40pm looking to the north west. The light pollution from the northern part of the city dimmed their glow slightly but I am still thrilled. They are stunning to see. 

    Formed around 80 km above the Earth's surface in the mesosphere, tiny, minute ice crystals form around cosmic dust at temperatures around -140 C. 

    These photographs were taken quickly on my smartphone so they are the best but even so, I'm one happy soul! 









    Tuesday, 24 June 2025

    What's in the sky July 2025

     Read for next month? Here are some things to look out for. I will update this page regularly as I find more things of interest to add. 

     

    WHAT’S IN THE NIGHT SKY FOR July 2025? (Northern Hemisphere)

     

    July 2nd

    For next few days look out for noctilucent clouds, shimmering, slivery blue clouds in NW after sunset.

     

    July 3rd

    Earth reaches aphelion 2054 BST – point in Earth’s orbit furthest from sun.

    Also, Mercury at greatest eastern elongation from the Sun (PM)

    With 25 degrees separating the Sun and Mercury, this is probably best opportunity to see the planet in the evening sky this year - should be easily seen, roughly 14 degrees over the western horizon 15 minutes after sunset.

    If the planet isn’t readily apparent, try scanning the horizon with binoculars to help you locate it.

     

    July 4th

    Conjunction: Venus and Uranus  will be separated by 2.4 degrees in morning. Venus easy to spot low above ENE horizon around 0330 whilst Uranus will be tricky to pick out in dawn twilight

     

    July 5th

    Venus And The Pleiades (AM)

    Venus is now passing the M45 Pleiades in the morning sky - use lower powered binoculars if you’d like a close view of them together - around 90 minutes before dawn - as the sky will need to be dark enough for the cluster to be easily visible - a good opportunity to capture an image of the two together.

     

    July 7th

    Red super Giant Antares is 2.3 degrees NW of this evening’s 91% lit waxing gibbous moon at 2300BST, low above Southern horizon

     

    July 9th

    Bright globular cluster NGC 6752 (mag +5.4) well placed in evening sky for next few nights; reaching highest point around midnight local time

     

    July 10th

    Full ‘Buck’ moon low in sky – illusion time when moon appears larger than it actually is

     

    July 13th

    Glimpse Venus above ENE horizon around 0330 BST

     

    July 17th

    The summer triangle asterism is high up, due south around 0100 BST – look for three bright stars – Deneb, Vega and Altair

     

    July 19th

    M45 Pleiades cluster close to moon tonight and tomorrow night as well

     

    July 20th

    The Waning Crescent Moon passes in front of the Pleiades star cluster in the early hours in North America.

     

    July 23rd

    Early alarm today mag -1.8 Jupiter at 4.2 degrees south of slender 3% lit waning crescent moon, both low above NE horizon around 0400 BST

     

    July 24th

    New Moon week (July 24 or 25)  - Try to capture the Galactic Centre of the Milky Way. It's the last month of optimal visibility!

     

    July 25th

    Short brief window of darkness – look for M8 bright Lagoon nebula and companion M20 Triffid nebula to north of teapot asterism

     

    July 26th

    Rising Venus will be 0.6 degrees SSW of Crab nebula M1 – dawn twilight and low altitude will make it tricky to catch

     

    July 28th

    Mars in evening sky joined by waxing crescent moon low above western horizon around 2200 BST

     

    July 30th

    Southern Delta Aquariid meteor shower reaches peak activity – around 25 meteors per hour

     

    July 31st

    Saturn rises around 2300 BST, reaching good altitude above SSE horizon before dawn.

     


    Sunday, 22 June 2025

    Further post editing of NGC 7000 The North American Nebula

     A few nights ago I managed to image NGC 7000 The North American Nebula and I was very pleased with the results. This post documents the night and my first image. 

    https://undersouthwestskies.blogspot.com/2025/06/imaging-ngc-7000-and-ic-5070-using.html

    A day or two later and I have had another go at post editing and this is the resultant image. 


    And here below is the original 'first effort' post editing of the data from a few days ago. 


    Quite a difference isn't it. I have managed to regain some of the nebula detail particularly in the areas I'd originally blown out. I think there is better definition an structure to some of the key features as well. 

    On the negative side - the colour balance still isn't right is it? I think it should be a deeper red colour but maybe I'm wrong on that?  

    Anyway, in the spirit of being a lifelong learner, please give me some feedback. It will help me and other beginners who visit these pages. All constructive criticism is welcome in the comment box at the end of the post and thanks for taking the time to give me and others useful feedback. Appreciated. 

    So what were the editing programs I used second time around? 
    • SIRIL V1.2.6
    • Affinity Photo
    • Photoscape X
    I followed the following video I found on YouTube - 


    How did I change my normal post editing workflow this time round? 

    You can read about my normal post editing workflow in a past post - here: https://undersouthwestskies.blogspot.com/2025/01/a-beginners-guide-to-using-siril-some.html

    This time around there were a few changes to what I do: 

    • I didn't use GraXpert
    • No deconvolution (not sure about this one - but I religiously followed the video) 
    • Workflow was all done in SIRIL as follows: 
      • Crop and rotation
      • Background extraction - and playing around with parameters more; did it twice
      • right hand mouse click and 'aberrations' to take a close look at the stars 
      • Colour calibration to get background neutralisation and also accurate 'whites'
      • Photometric colour calibration - ensuring focal length was more accurate - reflecting that I was using 135mm lens on APS-C crop sensor DSLR
      • General Hyperbolic stretch - using modified arcsinh in linear mode. I had drawn a tiny square on an area of dark background sky (when zoomed into the image). Used eye dropper to set symmetry point and then moved the middle and right hand side slider triangles about; also applied some highlights protection as well.  Repeated GHS x 3
      • Colour saturation adjustments - repeated for just cyan-blue adjustment as well 
      • Cosmetic correction applied
      • Starnet applied but with 'pre-stretch' box unticked
        • On starless image in linear mode - Histogram transformation  - just red channel - a few subtle repeat adjustments
        • then HTF on all colours
        • Colour saturation adjustments 
        • another GHS on 'even weighted luminance' mode
        • Close starless image and open starmask image
        • Green noise reduction 
        • Colour saturation adjustments - reduced slightly; repeated, reducing pink-red colouration slightly
        • Histogram Transformation - reducing stars by moving middle and right hand slider triangles
        • close starmask and re-open starless image
        • complete background extraction on this image - ensure no red squares are on nebulosity areas; increase samples line slider; add dither - switch between compute background image and 'original' image to see changes
        • Histogram transformation - adjust red and repeat - small iterations
      • Star recomposition  - GHS - select black point in menu - make small adjustments 
      • recrop to preference
      • GHS - on all colours - use symmetry point based on square in area of dark background within nebula area
      • colour saturation adjustments - first on global; then repeat for  pink-red and then again for cyan-blue
      • Histogram Transformation minor adjustments
      • SAVE as TIFF and open Affinity Photo 
    In Affinity Photo: 

    • in Camera RAW 'evelop' persona - adjustments to basic elements (exposure, white balance, saturation, vibrance, contrast, brightness etc
    • back to camera editor - denoising, sharpening, level adjustments 
    • EXPORT as PNG
    In Photoscape X
    • Film - find overlay that best adjusts final image and apply
    • Insert text and logos
    • SAVE as PNG
    I learned much more about how to do GHS and use color saturation from the above video.  I will try doing this again but next time including GraXpert and also Deconvolution in SIRIL